XiaoMiTool V2 will take care of most of the operations you would need to do, from when you connect the device to your pc until the desired rom or piece of software is installed. XiaoMiTool V2 it's the follow-up of XiaoMiTool, with improved stability, more features and better graphics. XiaoMiTool V2 (XMT2) is a unofficial tool for your personal computer that you can use to manage your xiaomi smartphone rom and software and do some modding easily. It's also easy to implement yourself if you want, FLAC file format is quite simple and reasonable (on the outer level, without looking into the actual compression of audio data - which is enough here).Download latest version of XiaoMiTool V2 What is XiaoMiTool V2 wasted space: foobar2000 has the ability to remove extra padding from FLAC files. corruption: Isn't there a switch which will abort encoding if a corrupted file is encountered? (-no-decode-through-errors, -warnings-as-errors) Why would you even sort or group by "tool"? (Isn't "format" enough?) Unless you encoded at say "-0" (some do, often by misunderstanding encoding speed vs decoding speed), or had a habit of embedding enormous picture files, which you later have deleted ( I do not think many applications can "reclaim" such wasted space?) or your hard drive is so full that you really want to squeeze out that last drop. Saving space? Likely not enough to bother. Unless you encoded at say "-0" (some do, often by misunderstanding encoding speed vs decoding speed), or had a habit of embedding enormous picture files, which you later have deleted (I do not think many applications can "reclaim" such wasted space?) or your hard drive is so full that you really want to squeeze out that last drop. I did of course not transcode the lossies, but I could and did get all the different "reference libFLAC" versions (from 1.1.4 and up) down to a single one. Re-encoding produces a "technically valid" FLAC file "with the corrupted content", and I do not want them to show up as OK, so I did not re-encode those.Īs for "benefits", my reason was cosmetic: when highlighting a bunch of files in my media player (foobar2000), it would show as "Tool" a bunch of different "reference libFLAC" versions before and in between the lossies, which made that view harder to read. My paranoia and my backup drive saved those, though.Īlso, I do unfortunately have a couple of corrupted FLAC files. But beware that the FLAC frontend, which is a tool that I guess people would employ, has eaten several of my files even if I asked it to verify. Re-encoding is possible and should be lossless. Quote from: MaxDread on 08:56:38 If changing, what will the benefits be? And should I be thinking about changing my existing FLACs to a more recent version (if that's even possible)? In short, yes to updating your FLAC encoder to the latest version, no to re-encoding your existing FLAC music files. It would be a lot of hassle and time while at best you would regain a few percent in storage space. If you are on Windows I would say there is a good reason to update as there are two security issue with FLAC encoders older than 1.3.1 ( CVE-2014-9028 and CVE-2014-8962 if you're interested in that sort of stuff).Īs for your last question, there is no real reason to encode your existing FLAC files to a new version. Encoding with newer versions is faster too. One thing you might see is a difference in size, files encoded with newer version could be slightly smaller as modern FLAC encoders are slightly more efficient. There is no difference to audio quality as all FLAC files made by any FLAC version are lossless. The effect on the resulting files will not be very big. What's the downside to this? Should I look to change it and keep up with the times or am I ok as I am? If changing, what will the benefits be? And should I be thinking about changing my existing FLACs to a more recent version (if that's even possible)? How important is it to update to the latest version of FLAC? When I rip CDs, I still rip to version 1.2.1.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |